Self-review in Zendesk allows agents to critically evaluate their own conversations, promoting self-improvement. This method trusts agents to assess their work.
By investing in hiring the right people, self-review empowers agents to reflect on their responses and job performance. It encourages personal growth and accountability, making it a valuable tool for agents to enhance their skills and service quality.
The manager reviewing agents' conversations method involves a CS Manager or Team Lead reviewing agents' work and providing feedback. This traditional approach is ideal for structured teams and ensures consistent feedback. In larger teams, a…
Peer-to-peer reviews in Zendesk involve agents reviewing each other's work, fostering a collaborative culture. This method is effective for smaller teams and open cultures. Agents can learn from their peers by observing how others handle similar…
Reactive review in Zendesk focuses on providing feedback for conversations where issues are known, such as poor CSAT ratings or long response times. It's a practical approach for large volumes of conversations. While it can introduce bias into…