Choosing the Right Rating Scale for QA Scorecards
How do I choose the right rating scale for my QA scorecard?
Choosing the right rating scale depends on your QA program's needs. Smaller scales like binary or 3-point are great for quick, consistent reviews, especially with large ticket volumes. Larger scales like 4-point or 5-point provide more depth and are ideal for programs focused on detailed feedback and coaching. Consider your team's priorities and the volume of tickets when selecting a scale.
More related questions
What are the benefits of using a binary scale on a QA scorecard?
A binary scale is ideal for quick and consistent reviews. It simplifies grading to 'good' or 'bad', making it perfect for handling large volumes of tickets where speed is crucial. This scale is the fastest and most straightforward, ensuring that…
How does a 3-point scale enhance QA scorecard reviews?
A 3-point scale allows for quick grading while adding a middle option for 'satisfactory' interactions. This scale provides a bit more nuance than a binary scale, enabling reviewers to capture interactions that are neither entirely 'good' nor 'bad'….
Why choose a 4-point scale for your QA scorecard?
A 4-point scale encourages critical thinking by eliminating a neutral option, requiring reviewers to make a decisive choice between 'good' and 'bad'. This scale offers more nuance than a binary scale while still maintaining a level of simplicity….
What are the advantages of a 5-point scale in QA scorecards?
A 5-point scale provides detailed feedback and mirrors an academic grading system, offering a familiar structure for reviewers. This scale allows for a more nuanced evaluation of interactions, but it can take longer to grade due to the increased…
Interested indeflectingover 70% of your Zendesk support tickets?
Zendesk Support Tickets
Zendesk Messaging (live chat)
Join1,000+ companies reducing their support costs and freeing up support agents for more important work
“We needed an AI agent integrated within our current tools. My AskAI was the only solution that wasn't going to disrupt our operations.”
Zeffy
“At the end of last year I was given the challenge - how can we provide the same or better service, without hiring anyone?”
Zinc
“My AskAI blew everybody else out of the water. It made the selection process very easy for us.”
Customer.io($50M+ ARR)
“It now resolves 71% of queries (over 35,000 every month), meaning more time solving complex issues and improving UX.”
Freecash
“We needed an AI agent integrated within our current tools. My AskAI was the only solution that wasn't going to disrupt our operations.”
Zeffy
“At the end of last year I was given the challenge - how can we provide the same or better service, without hiring anyone?”
Zinc
“My AskAI blew everybody else out of the water. It made the selection process very easy for us.”
Customer.io($50M+ ARR)
“It now resolves 71% of queries (over 35,000 every month), meaning more time solving complex issues and improving UX.”
Freecash
Reduce support costs.Spend more time on customer success.
